• About
  • Is there a medical test that can detect the health of gut flora?

TK Talk

~ Demystify science, Kant not cant

TK Talk

Tag Archives: volatilome

Do people in countries with lots of mosquitos get bitten all the time and always have itchy bites? Do you develop a tolerance to bites?

27 Sunday Aug 2017

Posted by Tirumalai Kamala in Microbiota, Mosquito, Skin

≈ Comments Off on Do people in countries with lots of mosquitos get bitten all the time and always have itchy bites? Do you develop a tolerance to bites?

Tags

volatilome

Mosquitoes don’t bite people indiscriminately. Mosquito biting preference is a product of its host seeking behavior which in turn depends on the odor/VOCs (Volatile organic compound – Wikipedia) it detects in its vicinity (1).

  • For example, a 2014 study found a tight link between the expression and ligand sensitivity of the Olfactory receptor – Wikipedia AaegOr4 by domestic mosquitoes and their preference for human odor (2).
  • Not surprising then that a recent study found deodorants could repel mosquitoes (3). Specifically, the deodorant compound isopropyl tetradecanoate was found to inhibit landings of the malaria mosquito Anopheles coluzzi in a repellent bioassay.

Host Skin Microbiota Profile Influences Attractiveness to Mosquitoes

Human odor/VOC is largely a product of skin-resident Microbiota – Wikipedia and it turns out mosquitoes are attracted to specific volatiles produced by specific bacterial species (see below from 4).

A small study on 48 human volunteers found that the African malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto found individuals with more abundant but less diverse skin bacterial profiles much more attractive compared to those they found poorly attractive (5).

Genetics of Human Odor & Heritability of Attractiveness to Mosquitoes

Attractiveness to mosquitoes is heritable since a twin study found skin volatiles from identical twins were much more highly correlated for mosquito attractiveness compared to non-identical twins (6).

Studies have for long linked the human odor profile to HLA (Human leukocyte antigen – Wikipedia) (7, 8, 9). A small study on 48 human volunteers found those with the HLA gene Cw*07 were more attractive to the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto (10). HLA is integral to immune function which in turn clearly helps select an individual’s microbiota composition, though how this is accomplished is still an intensive area of contemporary cutting-edge research.

While human odor is largely the product of human genetics (HLA) and ecology (skin microbiota), it’s also influenced by diet, grooming habits and health status. Studies such as the deodorant study (3) suggest that innate mosquito preference for a particular individual could at least be somewhat mitigated if not thwarted outright.

Bibliography

1. Takken, Willem, and Niels O. Verhulst. “Host preferences of blood-feeding mosquitoes.” Annual review of entomology 58 (2013): 433-453. http://izt.ciens.ucv.ve/ecologia…

2. McBride, Carolyn S., et al. “Evolution of mosquito preference for humans linked to an odorant receptor.” Nature 515.7526 (2014): 222-227. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org…

3. Verhulst, Niels O., et al. “Attractiveness of volatiles from different body parts to the malaria mosquito Anopheles coluzzii is affected by deodorant compounds.” Scientific reports 6 (2016). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc…

4. Takken, Willem, and Niels Verhulst. “Chemical signaling in mosquito-host interactions: the role of human skin microbiota.” Current Opinion in Insect Science (2017).

5. Verhulst, Niels O., et al. “Composition of human skin microbiota affects attractiveness to malaria mosquitoes.” PloS one 6.12 (2011): e28991. http://journals.plos.org/plosone…

6. Fernández-Grandon, G. Mandela, et al. “Heritability of attractiveness to mosquitoes.” PloS one 10.4 (2015): e0122716. http://journals.plos.org/plosone…

7. Wedekind, Claus, and Sandra Füri. “Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 264.1387 (1997): 1471-1479. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc…

8. Wedekind, Claus, and Dustin Penn. “MHC genes, body odours, and odour preferences.” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 15.9 (2000): 1269-1271. https://www.researchgate.net/pro…;

9. Savelev, Sergey U., et al. “Individual variation in 3-methylbutanal: a putative link between human leukocyte antigen and skin microflora.” Journal of chemical ecology 34.9 (2008): 1253-1257. https://www.researchgate.net/pro…

10. Verhulst, Niels O., et al. “Relation between HLA genes, human skin volatiles and attractiveness of humans to malaria mosquitoes.” Infection, genetics and evolution 18 (2013): 87-93. https://www.researchgate.net/pro…

https://www.quora.com/Do-people-in-countries-with-lots-of-mosquitos-get-bitten-all-the-time-and-always-have-itchy-bites-Do-you-develop-a-tolerance-to-bites/answer/Tirumalai-Kamala

Advertisements

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...

What are the illnesses that can be reliably detected by odor?

10 Monday Apr 2017

Posted by Tirumalai Kamala in Cancer, Clostridium difficile, Odor, Tuberculosis (TB), Tumor

≈ Comments Off on What are the illnesses that can be reliably detected by odor?

Tags

Antoine Lavoisier, Capnography, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), volatilome

Just analyze someone’s breath, mucus, saliva, sweat or urine and diagnose whether they have diabetes, cancer, COPD, IBD, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), Tuberculosis (TB), or any other disease for that matter. Now that would be a seismic revolution in medicine. For one, fully non-invasive in complete contrast to the present-day staples, needles and blood draws, and the pain and fear they entail. Could also be done as often as possible, even when asleep or anesthetized during surgery, even in real-time, as point-of-care, i.e., truly portable and thus truly mobile. Underlying idea is the body’s physiological emanations reliably communicate unique signatures of underlying diseases in the form of singular mixes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), i.e., the human ‘volatilome‘. The reality, OTOH, is a sharp, painful thud since the ground reality is one where most of these possibilities remain not even remotely feasible in the near future.

Volatilome historians point to the French chemist, Antoine Lavoisier, as the modern inspiration for diagnosis using exhaled breath (1). He showed the body produces and exhales carbon dioxide. In turn this became the basis for Capnography, monitoring the concentration pressure or partial pressure of carbon dioxide in respiratory gases, the most common breath test. Antiquated roots notwithstanding, using unique signatures from breath and other emanations for disease diagnosis still remains deep in research mode and far from much practical utility. A 2014 review lists a total of only 7 US FDA-approved breath-related tests (see below from 2).

Obstacles To Widespread Non-invasive Sampling of Body Emanations For Disease Diagnosis

I. Unlike Animal Olfaction, Human Technology’s Remained Too Constrained In Choice Of What To Analyze

Default, standard analytical approach to sampling and analyzing compounds present in emanations is to rely on ‘headspace’ analysis (3, see below from 4), jargon that means sampling what is already in the gas phase, i.e., already volatile in the material, rather than attempt to extract compounds of interest from it.

Problem is this can cut off too thin a slice of the pie. This shows up in the results since technical approaches continue to fail to mimic what animals do so effortlessly when they use smell to communicate, forage and assess the health of those around them. This brings us to animals and their remarkable capacity to sniff out disease so much so that anecdotal reports suggest they can even be far more accurate in diagnosing human diseases compared to human technologies.

Two diseases with substantial research on animals successfully sniffing them out in humans are Skin Cancers by dogs and TB by Giant African pouched rats.

IA. Dogs Can Spontaneously Detect Human Skin Cancer & Can Also Be Trained To Detect Clostridium difficile infection (CDI)

In 1989, the Lancet published what is perhaps the first modern report of a dog sniffing out its owner’s melanoma (See below from 5)

In 2001, a follow-up anecdotal study (6) added two other case reports of dogs accurately sniffing out skin cancer lesions,

  • One, a London, UK report on Parker, a pet labrador who sniffed it out on a 66 year old man’s left thigh. The patient had developed an eczema patch there. Treated unsuccessfully by topical steroids and antifungals, it grew slowly over 18 years. In 1994, Parker became a family member. Around 1999, Parker started to persistently push his nose against the patient’s trouser leg and sniff the lesion beneath it, i.e., could smell something about the lesion even through clothing. This induced the patient to re-consult his family physician. The lesion was excised in September 2000 and histology showed it to be a fully excised basal cell carcinoma. Once lesion was fully removed, Parker no longer showed interest in that area.
  • The other, by George, a Florida, USA, K-9 unit schnauzer trained by his retired handler to recognize in vitro malignant melanoma samples. A local dermatologist had read the original 1989 Lancet case report and teamed up with the handler to see if such a result was repeatable with another dog. When George was introduced to a patient with several moles considered cancer-free, he went ‘crazy’ over one particular mole, which when excised confirmed ‘early malignant disease’.

Authors of this second case report speculated dogs might also be able to detect odors associated with specific diseases such as TB and Ebola.

In 2012, The BMJ published a proof of principle study on Cliff, a 2 year old beagle trained to sniff out human Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remarkably accurately (7).

Such reports have provoked more systematic studies, which conclude that dogs could detect unique odors emanating from human melanoma and other cancers (8, 9, 10).

Problem is clinical scope for using dogs to diagnose diseases is limited given the costs, effort, space and time required to train sniffer dogs to detect various diseases (11).

IB. Giant African Pouched Rats Can Be Trained To Reliably Detect Human Tuberculosis (TB)

Used to diagnose lung TB in resource-poor settings, the antiquated microscopic Ziehl–Neelsen stain is a standard method for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Sputum (coughed up mucus). A few studies suggest trained Giant pouched rat are not just as sensitive and accurate but also able to process >50 times more samples per day compared to a lab technician, i.e., much more economical (12). The WHO recommends microscopists not analyze more than an average of 20 samples per day to minimize misdiagnoses (13) while two trained giant African pouched rats could reach a total of 70 consensus results in 32 minutes over 2 sessions each. This means trained rats could screen larger populations in a much shorter time meaning faster TB diagnoses and hence potential for reduced TB transmission, i.e., a potentially enormous public health benefit.

The video below shows how the Belgian social enterprise APOPO trains these rats in Tanzania to accurately diagnose TB from human samples.

II. Inadequate Research Efforts To Deconstruct The Human Volatilome

Clearly animals are able to smell broader, more complex mix of volatile chemicals that the most sophisticated chemical extraction techniques used in volatilome analysis miss (3). In order for technologies to be able to replicate what animals seem to do so effortlessly, research needs to systematically unravel the human volatilome and establish a reference base of what that looks like in health in order to be able to discern and diagnose cause of ill-health simply from analyzing someone’s emanations.

What compounds are present in normal breath, urine, skin emanations, saliva, blood and feces? A compendium of the healthy human volatilome was first described only in 2014 (14), meaning a foundational study has come along only in the very recent past. This study is foundational for the following reasons,

  • It identified compounds in breath (874), urine (279), skin emanations (504), saliva (353), blood (130), feces (381).
  • It classified these compounds by their CAS Registry Number (CAS), unique numerical identifier assigned to every chemical substance described in the published scientific literature.
    • Hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific papers are routinely published on the human volatilome. Problem is there is as yet no standardization of procedures or data reporting. As a result, the literature is awash in duplicates.
    • Does exhaled breath really have ~3000 different compounds? Umm, looks like it’s less than a fourth of that.
  • This 2014 paper (14) is thus the first step in the right direction, namely to consolidate, synthesize and whittle down published information into a potentially universal ‘megatable’ of compounds present in healthy human emanations.

III. Too Much Technical Sensitivity Can Sometimes Be Too Much Of A Good Thing

  • Iterations over decades have vastly improved sensitivity of state-of-the-art volatilome analysis methods like Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS), Selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) and other techniques such that they can easily measure ~1000 compounds.
    • Problem is most volatilome studies investigate a handful of subjects, not the thousands necessary to validate variables that are different between those with or without diseases.
    • One review (1) suggests number of subjects should be >5X the number of analytes measured, clearly something that adds prohibitive cost to such studies but not doing so increases chances for what they call ‘voodoo correlations’, an issue compounded by dividing test populations further into sub-groups.
  • Volatilome data are also not standardized, neither are the procedures (1, 3, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). This makes meta-analyses, i.e., comparison of data across multiple studies, well-nigh impossible.
  • As with so many topics in biomedical research, human volatilome studies have heretofore paid scant attention to human Microbiota (19), how it shapes the human volatilome and how that process not only differs between health and disease but also yields different outcomes, i.e., different volatile signatures (1, 3).

That said, there are several diseases with candidate volatile biomarkers that await final validation (see tables below from 20). The sky’s very much the limit for diagnosing diseases through their distinctive odors.

Bibliography

1. Amann, Anton, et al. “The human volatilome: volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath, skin emanations, urine, feces and saliva.” Journal of breath research 8.3 (2014): 034001.

2. Amann, Anton, et al. “Analysis of exhaled breath for disease detection.” Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry 7 (2014): 455-482.

3. Kimball, Bruce A. “Volatile metabolome: problems and prospects.” (2016). http://www.future-science.com/do…

4. Restek, A. “Technical Guide for Static Headspace Analysis Using GC.” Restek Corp (2000): 11-12. http://www.restek.com/pdfs/59895…

5. Williams, Hywel, and Andres Pembroke. “Sniffer dogs in the melanoma clinic?.” The Lancet 333.8640 (1989): 734.

6. Church, John, and Hywel Williams. “Another sniffer dog for the clinic?.” The Lancet 358.9285 (2001): 930. http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/jo…

7. Bomers, Marije K., et al. “Using a dog’s superior olfactory sensitivity to identify Clostridium difficile in stools and patients: proof of principle study.” (2012): e7396. http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/3…

8. Pickel, Duane, et al. “Evidence for canine olfactory detection of melanoma.” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89.1 (2004): 107-116. http://sniffoutcancer.org/images…

9. Moser, Emily, and Michael McCulloch. “Canine scent detection of human cancers: a review of methods and accuracy.” Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 5.3 (2010): 145-152. https://www.researchgate.net/pro…

10. Jezierski, Tadeusz, et al. “Study of the art: canine olfaction used for cancer detection on the basis of breath odour. Perspectives and limitations.” Journal of breath research 9.2 (2015): 027001. https://www.researchgate.net/pro…

11. Buljubasic, Fanis, and Gerhard Buchbauer. “The scent of human diseases: a review on specific volatile organic compounds as diagnostic biomarkers.” Flavour and Fragrance Journal 30.1 (2015): 5-25.

12. Mgode, Georgies F., et al. “Diagnosis of tuberculosis by trained African giant pouched rats and confounding impact of pathogens and microflora of the respiratory tract.” Journal of clinical microbiology 50.2 (2012): 274-280. Diagnosis of Tuberculosis by Trained African Giant Pouched Rats and Confounding Impact of Pathogens and Microflora of the Respiratory Tract

13. World Health Organization, et al. “Management of tuberculosis: training for district TB coordinators.” (2005). http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstre…

14. de Lacy Costello, Ben, et al. “A review of the volatiles from the healthy human body.” Journal of breath research 8.1 (2014): 014001. https://www.researchgate.net/pro…

15. Pereira, Jorge, et al. “Breath analysis as a potential and non-invasive frontier in disease diagnosis: an overview.” Metabolites 5.1 (2015): 3-55. Breath Analysis as a Potential and Non-Invasive Frontier in Disease Diagnosis: An Overview

16. Boots, Agnes W., et al. “Exhaled molecular fingerprinting in diagnosis and monitoring: validating volatile promises.” Trends in molecular medicine 21.10 (2015): 633-644. https://www.breathcloud.org/wp-c…

17. Bikov, Andras, Zsófia Lázár, and Ildiko Horvath. “Established methodological issues in electronic nose research: how far are we from using these instruments in clinical settings of breath analysis?.” Journal of breath research 9.3 (2015): 034001.

18. Scarlata, Simone, et al. “Exhaled breath analysis by electronic nose in respiratory diseases.” Expert review of molecular diagnostics 15.7 (2015): 933-956.

19. Dietert, Rodney Reynolds, and Ellen Kovner Silbergeld. “Biomarkers for the 21st century: listening to the microbiome.” Toxicological Sciences (2015): kfv013. Listening to the Microbiome

20. Kataoka, Hiroyuki, et al. “Noninvasive analysis of volatile biomarkers in human emanations for health and early disease diagnosis.” Bioanalysis 5.11 (2013): 1443-1459. https://www.researchgate.net/pro…

Thanks for the R2A, Jonathan Brill.

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-illnesses-that-can-be-reliably-detected-by-odor/answer/Tirumalai-Kamala

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...
Tirumalai Kamala

Tirumalai Kamala

A Ph.D. in Microbiology from India. Immunology training and research at the NIH, USA. Science is not just a career, rather it's my vocation. My specific interests: 1. Our immune responses. How do they start? Continue? Stop? 2. Science as an enterprise. The boons and banes. Why we do what we do. How do we do it? This blog re-posts my Quora answers. Its purpose is to demystify science and to share snippets of insights I've gained in my journey thus far in both life and science.

View Full Profile →

April 2018
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Archives

  • April 2018 (6)
  • March 2018 (8)
  • February 2018 (8)
  • January 2018 (9)
  • December 2017 (9)
  • November 2017 (9)
  • October 2017 (9)
  • September 2017 (8)
  • August 2017 (9)
  • July 2017 (9)
  • June 2017 (8)
  • May 2017 (9)
  • April 2017 (9)
  • March 2017 (8)
  • February 2017 (8)
  • January 2017 (9)
  • December 2016 (8)
  • November 2016 (9)
  • October 2016 (9)
  • September 2016 (21)
  • August 2016 (10)
  • July 2016 (8)
  • June 2016 (9)
  • May 2016 (9)
  • April 2016 (8)
  • March 2016 (9)
  • February 2016 (8)
  • January 2016 (9)
  • December 2015 (9)
  • November 2015 (9)
  • October 2015 (10)
  • September 2015 (9)
  • August 2015 (9)
  • July 2015 (9)
  • June 2015 (8)
  • May 2015 (9)
  • April 2015 (10)
  • March 2015 (9)
  • February 2015 (8)
  • January 2015 (17)
  • December 2014 (14)

Blogroll

  • My LinkedIn Profile
  • My Quora Profile
  • niaIDEAList's Report
  • NIHilist's Immunology

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 86 other followers

Follow TK Talk on WordPress.com

Category

Academia Allergic hypersensitivity Allergy Anti-viral Antibiotics Antibodies Asthma Atopic dermatitis Atopy Autism Autoimmunity Bacteria B cells BCG Vaccine Biology Biomedical research Biomedicine Biotechnology Blood Brain Cancer Cancer Therapeutics CD4 helper T cells CD8 T cells Cell lines Clinical trials Clostridium difficile CNS (Central Nervous System) Diagnostics Diet Eczema (atopic dermatitis) Epidemiology Epigenetics Evolution FDA Fecal Microbiota Transplant Fever Fungi Gut microbiota Hepatitis B Hepatitis C HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) Human Human Gut Microbiota Hygiene Hypothesis Hypothesis Immune dysregulation Immune Responses Immune System Immune Tolerance Immunity Immunologic Adjuvant Immunological Memory Immunology Immunotherapy India Infection Infectious disease Infectious diseases Inflammation Influenza Informed Consent Life Major Histocompatibility Molecule (MHC) Malaria Medicine Microbe Microbiology Microbiome Microbiota Mosquito Mosquito-borne diseases Mouse MS (Multiple Sclerosis) Obesity Pathogens Philosophy Placebos Psychology RA (Rheumatoid Arthritis) Rabies Science Scientific data Scientific Method Scientific Publication Scientific Research Skin Start-up Statistics T cells Technology Tuberculosis (TB) Tumor Tumor-specific antigens Vaccination Route Vaccines Vector-borne diseases Virus WHO Zika

Tags

Academic Journals Academic Publishing Academic Research Adjuvants Albert Calmette ALL (Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia) Antibody isotype Barry Marshall B cell development Blood test Breast-feeding Cancer Immunotherapy CAR (Chimeric Antigen Receptor)-T Charles Janeway Checkpoint inhibitors Ciprofloxacin Clemens von Pirquet Cold Coley's toxins Correlates of Protection Cross-reactivity Cytokines DTaP (Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis) Edward Tufte Elizabeth Holmes Fabrizio Benedetti Flavivirus Gastrointestinal (GI) tract Graphpad Prism Guido Majno Guinea pig Helicobacter pylori HIV Human Papilloma virus Immune responses Intravenous Isabelle Joris John Carreyrou Lactobacillus Lactobacillus plantarum Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lineage Margaret McFall-Ngai Marginal zone B cells Measles Meta-analysis Monoclonal antibody (mAb) Mycobacterium tuberculosis Newborn NK (natural killer) cell Passive Immunity Paul W. Ewald Ph. D. Placenta Plasmodium Primordial life Psychoneuroimmunology Publication bias Rhinovirus Robert Koch Silicon Valley Smallpox Streptococcus pneumoniae Ted Kaptchuk Theranos Tissue Transplant Transplantation Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL) Vaginal Microbiota Vagus nerve Vision Vitamin D William Coley Yellow Fever
  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments
Advertisements

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel
%d bloggers like this: